…
…
Switzerland
Herz — Switzerland Desk · · 30s summary · 3 min read
Switzerland’s Federal Council has launched its campaign against the popular initiative “For Safe Food”, which will be put to a vote on September 27, 2026. At a press conference on August 11, Swiss President Guy Parmelin set out the government’s objections. The initiative would require Switzerland to raise its food self-sufficiency rate—the share of domestic consumption covered by national production—from about 45% to at least 70% within ten years. The Federal Council instead backs the Agricultural Policy 2030 framework, now being developed, which targets 50% and covers the entire food supply chain.
On August 11, 2026, the Swiss Federal Council officially launched its campaign against the popular initiative “For Safe Food”, according to Le Temps. Guy Parmelin, President of the Swiss Confederation and head of the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research, led the press conference.
The initiative’s full title is “For Safe Food—through stronger sustainable domestic production, more plant-based food and clean drinking water”. It will be put to a nationwide vote on September 27, 2026.
It would require Switzerland to reach a food self-sufficiency rate of at least 70% within ten years, mainly by increasing the domestic production of plant-based food. The rate measures how much of national food consumption is covered by domestic production.
Switzerland’s current food self-sufficiency rate is about 45%. Agricultural Policy 2030, a federal framework still under development, targets 50%.
The Federal Council says approval of the initiative would entail a substantial reduction in meat and egg consumption. According to the government, the authorities would have to intervene extensively in consumers’ food choices, an approach it considers “neither desirable nor, above all, proportionate”.
The illustrations in this article are generated by artificial intelligence.
No comments yet. Be the first to react.
neither desirable nor, above all, proportionate
The ten-year deadline is another concern for the government. Some agricultural investments take between 20 and 30 years to pay off. Parmelin said such a rapid transition could make them obsolete before they had been amortised and would generate substantial support costs for the federal budget.
Parmelin also argued that a 70% rate could prove counterproductive. If domestic meat supplies became insufficient, people living near Switzerland’s borders could buy their food abroad—a scenario he described as an “own goal” for the initiative’s supporters.
The Federal Councillor also defended continued ruminant farming. He said cattle and other ruminants make better use of Switzerland’s hills and Alpine pastures, while the shift towards consuming fewer animal products is already happening naturally.
The Federal Council presents Agricultural Policy 2030 as a more gradual and realistic alternative. Still being prepared, the framework covers the entire food chain: production, processing, distribution and consumers. It is not a formal counterproposal to the initiative.
Christian Hofer, director of the Federal Office for Agriculture—the Swiss federal government’s centre of expertise for the agricultural sector—said Parliament had required the framework to incorporate environmental protection, biodiversity and social considerations.
It would require Switzerland to raise its food self-sufficiency rate to at least 70% within ten years, mainly by expanding plant-based food production and ensuring clean drinking water.
It is about 45%. Agricultural Policy 2030 targets 50%, compared with the initiative’s proposed 70%.
It is a federal strategic framework under development that covers the entire food chain, from production to consumption. Parliament has required it to address environmental protection, biodiversity and social considerations. It is not a formal counterproposal to the initiative.
The nationwide vote is scheduled for September 27, 2026.