…
…
World
Herz — World Desk · · 30s summary · 1 min read
The University of Hamburg found no plagiarism in Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf’s doctoral dissertation and has closed its investigation, Die Zeit reports. The university’s responsible bodies determined that the allegation of academic misconduct was unfounded. The review began about a year ago following reports of alleged similarities with her husband Hubertus Gersdorf’s postdoctoral habilitation thesis. The case unfolded alongside a political dispute over her proposed appointment to Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court. The Potsdam law professor, nominated by the Social Democratic Party, withdrew her candidacy in August 2025 after the planned election was cancelled.
The University of Hamburg found no plagiarism in Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf’s doctoral dissertation, according to Die Zeit.
The university’s responsible bodies determined that the allegation of academic misconduct was unfounded. The investigation has now been closed.
About a year ago, the university asked its ombuds office for academic integrity to examine the dissertation.
The review followed reports of alleged similarities with the postdoctoral habilitation thesis of her husband, Hubertus Gersdorf.
Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, a law professor in Potsdam, had been due to become a judge on Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court.
The court, established in 1951 and based in Karlsruhe, examines whether laws comply with Germany’s Basic Law.
She was nominated by Germany’s Social Democratic Party, known by its German abbreviation SPD.
Strong reservations within the Union led to a dispute between the coalition partners, and the election was subsequently cancelled.
The available information does not specify the nature of the alleged similarities between the two academic works.
The illustrations in this article are generated by artificial intelligence.
No comments yet. Be the first to react.