…
…
Business
Herz — Business Desk · · 30s summary · 2 min read
A Consumerfieldwork survey of 1,000 German employees reveals that 13% admit to incorrectly recording their working time. Three-quarters say they have already performed personal tasks during their work hours. The consequences can be severe: in early 2025, a Cologne regional labour court validated the immediate dismissal of a ticket inspector who spent his working hours at his girlfriend's place, in cafés and at the hairdresser's. He was ordered to reimburse €21,000 in detective fees incurred by his employer. Such a dismissal also triggers a suspension of three months of unemployment benefits.
According to a survey by the Consumerfieldwork firm among 1,000 German employees, 13% say they regularly fail to record their working time correctly. Three-quarters of respondents admit to having already performed a personal task during their work hours.
A case decided in early 2025 illustrates the real risks. A ticket inspector at a transport authority had spent his working hours at his girlfriend's place, in cafés and at the hairdresser's. The Landesarbeitsgericht (regional labour court) of Cologne — a German labour court — upheld his immediate dismissal, according to Handelsblatt.
The dismissed employee was also ordered to reimburse the detective fees incurred by his employer to establish the facts, totalling €21,000.
Immediate dismissal for work time fraud exposes the employee to a suspension of three months of his unemployment benefits.
Employment lawyer Michael Fuhlrott points out that fraud can also occur under a so-called Vertrauensarbeitszeit regime — literally 'working time based on trust', in which hours are not necessarily clocked — if the employee works only 20 hours instead of the agreed 40 hours.
Criminal prosecution is legally possible, but German prosecutors show little eagerness to pursue such cases, Fuhlrott adds.
Sascha Stowasser, director of the IFAA (Institut für angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft, or Institute for Applied Labour Science), believes that work time fraud results primarily from poorly defined objectives and lack of management. He therefore rules out any systematic malicious intent on the part of employees.
The illustrations in this article are generated by artificial intelligence.
No comments yet. Be the first to react.
The precise definitions of several German legal terms used in this article — including Landesarbeitsgericht and Vertrauensarbeitszeit — could not be independently verified from available documentary sources. Their meaning was inferred from the context of the facts reported and the etymology of the terms. The exact nature of the IFAA (Institut für angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft) was also not independently verified.
It is the act of reporting hours not worked or performing personal activities during work hours, while giving the employer the impression that this time is dedicated to work.
Immediate dismissal for this reason triggers a suspension of three months of unemployment benefits. The employee may also be ordered to reimburse expenses incurred by the employer to establish the fraud, such as detective fees.
It is legally possible in Germany, but employment lawyer Michael Fuhlrott indicates that prosecutors show little eagerness to pursue such cases in practice.