…
…
Business
Herz — Business Desk · · 30s summary · 3 min read
On July 24, 2026, the Trump administration justified its new wave of tariffs against numerous trading partners by citing forced labor in supply chains. The European Union, which has adopted legislation banning products made with forced labor, receives better U.S. tariff treatment than the United Kingdom, which has not yet enacted equivalent laws. European exporters gain a competitive advantage in certain U.S. market sectors. China and Canada are compensating for lost American trade by expanding their commerce with other world regions.
On July 24, 2026, the Trump administration justified its new round of tariffs against dozens of trading partners by citing forced labor in supply chains. According to the BBC, this justification also serves as a legal shield against potential challenges in Congress or U.S. courts.
For the UK, the nominal rate remains at 10%, but it applies on top of other tariffs on certain products—particularly shoes and textiles. For the EU, the 10% rate is all-inclusive and does not stack with additional tariffs.
The European advantage stems from a law the EU adopted banning products made with forced labor. This is precisely the criterion Washington used to calibrate its tariff rates.
The UK has not yet adopted equivalent legislation. In October 2025, the British government did declare its intention to strongly oppose state-imposed forced labor, but indicated it was examining the best way to reflect this position, citing operational and legal complexities.
strongly oppose state-imposed forced labor
— British government, October 2025
The UK has nonetheless negotiated partial agreements with Washington in several sectors: pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum, automobiles, and whisky—the latter notably with the support of King Charles.
William Bain, a trade expert at the British Chambers of Commerce—a national network of 52 regional chambers across the UK—confirms that EU exporters enjoy a competitive advantage in certain sectors of the U.S. market compared to their British counterparts.
No comments yet. Be the first to react.
China's trade with the United States remained flat in the first half of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. Its trade with the rest of the world, however, grew 21%: up 14% with the EU, 11% with the UK, and 24% with Africa.
Canada illustrates the same pattern of reorientation: it has increased its trade with the rest of the world more than it has lost on the American side.
The effective rates cited by the BBC (8.5% for the EU, 6.8% for the UK) are presented as estimates and reflect trade-weighted calculations. The methodology for these calculations is not detailed in available sources. The BBC indicates these rates would make European exporters more competitive in the U.S. market, but does not explain the mechanism behind this advantage given the apparently higher rate for the EU.
It remains unknown whether and when the UK will adopt a forced labor law comparable to the EU's, and whether such legislation would alter the tariff terms negotiated with Washington.
This justification serves both as a moral argument and as a legal shield, making it harder for opponents to challenge these tariffs in Congress or U.S. courts, according to the BBC.
Both regions face a nominal 10% rate on exports to the U.S. For the UK, this stacks on top of other tariffs on products like shoes and textiles. For the EU, the 10% is all-inclusive, with no additional tariffs.
The UK secured partial agreements on pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum, automobiles, and whisky, the latter notably with the intervention of King Charles.
No. While China's trade with the U.S. remained flat in H1 2026, its global trade grew 21%, with increases to the EU (+14%), UK (+11%), and Africa (+24%).
World