…
…
Business
Herz — Business Desk · · 30s summary · 3 min read
The European Commission fined Google €890 million on July 23, 2026 for two violations of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), the EU's regulation on digital markets adopted in 2022. Google was sanctioned for favoring its own services in search results and for restricting app developers from directing users to cheaper offers outside Google Play Store. The fine breaks down as €460 million for search violations and €430 million for Play Store restrictions. Google can appeal the decision. The timing, shortly before US tariff deadlines expire, raised political tensions, though EU officials deny any connection between the fine and trade disputes.
The European Commission fined Google €890 million on July 23, 2026, according to The Guardian. The fine targets two separate violations of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) — regulation (EU) 2022/1925 on contestable and fair digital markets, adopted by the European Union in 2022.
The fine has two components. The €460 million for search penalties Google's favoritism toward its own services — Google Shopping, the group's price comparison tool, and hotel offerings — in its search results, to the detriment of competitors. The €430 million for the app store targets Google Play Store, the official application store for Android devices: Google prohibited developers from directing consumers to cheaper offers available on other platforms or websites.
To remedy these practices, the Commission ordered Google to treat third-party services in its search results in a 'fair and non-discriminatory' manner and to permit developers to offer their services outside the Play Store.
Google had already begun testing modifications in how it displays shopping products and flight results. The Commission recognized these changes as 'substantial progress toward compliance'.
Unlike classical antitrust law, the DMA imposes obligations directly on large platforms designated as 'gatekeepers', without requiring the Commission to prove abuse of dominant position or demonstrable market harm. The legal fine cap can reach 10% of the company's global annual turnover. Google was formally designated a gatekeeper for Google Search, Play, Maps, Shopping, YouTube, and Chrome on September 6, 2023.
Google's practice of favoring Google Shopping in search results was previously sanctioned in June 2017 under classical antitrust law, with a €2.42 billion fine — a process far more lengthy to establish. The DMA aims specifically to avoid such lengthy demonstrations by setting direct prohibitions.
The decision was announced just hours before a series of temporary US tariffs on some 60 countries expired, a timing coincidence that could provoke Donald Trump's anger.
A senior EU official stated that the Union holds the 'sovereign right' to regulate American technology companies within its jurisdiction and that the fine's timing is unrelated to tariff disputes.
No comments yet. Be the first to react.
Google can appeal the decision to European courts and request provisional measures, including suspension of the fine pending trial. The outcome and timeline of such proceedings are not yet known.
The DMA is regulation (EU) 2022/1925 on digital markets, adopted in September 2022 and applicable since May 2023. It imposes competition obligations directly on large platforms designated 'gatekeepers', without requiring the Commission to prove abuse of dominant position.
The 2017 (€2.42B), 2018 (€4.34B), and 2019 (€1.49B) antitrust fines resulted from lengthy proceedings requiring proof of abuse of dominant position. The €890 million DMA fine operates under a different framework where the Commission need not demonstrate actual market harm.
Google must display third-party services — price comparators, hotel offers — in search results without disadvantaging them relative to its own products. On Play Store, it must allow developers to inform users that cheaper offers are available elsewhere.
Yes. Google can appeal to European courts and request provisional measures, including suspension of the fine during proceedings.
A senior EU official formally denied any connection, stating that the Union has the sovereign right to regulate technology companies operating in its jurisdiction, independent of ongoing tariff negotiations.